A top journal. Reviewers are very demanding, and had a strict and rigorous logic. It is difficult to be accepted.

(55) Thank | LJ2020

Review speed: 3.0 | Submission hit rate: 50.0 
Research focus: Autophagy; Signal transduction; Cancer 
Experience sharing: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition) has been cited over 10,000 times...

(0) Thank | 留云鸿彩

It has been a month since the review was completed, but there has been no news. I have sent two reminder emails during this time, and both times I was told that it is with the editor. By the way, I want to complain about this journal - I couldn't find the email for the editorial department, so I had to contact the peer review email. Are there any partners who have had a similar situation? What happened afterwards?

(0) Thank | 如影凯泽

Can you please tell me the final result? Will the system display the revisions made in the final formatting modification?

(0) Thank | 终幕亦瑶

Research focus: Cancer
Experience sharing: Three revisions, the last one was resubmitted after formatting modifications, and the system has been showing "Decision Pending" for almost 20 days! Have any of you encountered this situation before, my friends?

(0) Thank | 一条小君洁

After dragging on for more than two months, the issue was finally resolved after several emails were sent.

(0) Thank | 雨巷少年峰军

Encountered a procrastinating reviewer

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

How long does it take for the proof? How long for online?

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

A few days ago, I sent an email inquiring about the status of the review, as the reviewer has not responded

(0) Thank | Harley Samuel

Maybe a suitable reviewer couldn't be found

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

Has it been almost two months since it went out for review and we still haven't received any feedback from the first review?

(0) Thank | Harley Samuel

How did it turn out?

(0) Thank | 一条小君洁

It has been dragging on for two and a half months

(0) Thank | 雨巷少年峰军

Understand?

(0) Thank | daaaaaaa

Research focus: Autophagy; Cancer
Experience sharing: It has been almost three months since the article was revised, but the system keeps showing "with journal administrator". I have sent an email to the system and they said the editor is still processing it! Has anyone encountered this situation before?!

(0) Thank | 一条小君洁

Every few years, a "Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (xxth edition)" is released, cited thousands of times in a year. Only one or two hundred articles are published in a year. It's just surviving on this guideline. The actual level is very low

(1) Thank | 首龚

Is it proven now?

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

Hello experts, what is the next process after an article shows "Accept" in the system? I'm not sure if there is an issue between the submission system and the boss's email, as the boss has never received a decision letter. They have always had to email to inquire after seeing the status change. I want to know how long it takes for proofreading after Acceptance? Will the proof be sent via email or will there be a notification in the system? Thank you, experts

(0) Thank | 疯魔千白

Research focus: Autophagy; Plant sharing experience: The status has been "with journal administrator" for over a month after revising the article. Has anyone encountered this situation before?

(0) Thank | 一条小君洁

You revised it in two weeks, right? You didn't forget to make the changes according to the reviewer's comments, did you?

(0) Thank | 雾水松彬

Decision Pending, has there been any change in the status of your submission in the past few days?

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

Yes

(0) Thank | 马吉马尔兹

Like me, the revision was rejected by the editor directly

(0) Thank | 玉女文鑫

Good luck to you

(0) Thank | 玉女文鑫

Two reviewers, one is more positive and the other one is critical! They have given us three months to do additional experiments, we cannot extend the deadline

(0) Thank | 一条小君洁