The reviewer and editor are very serious, and the manuscript has been modified for many times. Although the impact factor is not high, the quality control is very strict, and the reputation is good. It is worth having!

(2) Thank | moony

A very good journal, the submission process was relatively smooth, the comments from reviewing experts were also in place, and I have learned a lot. As an old Japanese agricultural meteorological journal, it is worth submissions.

(5) Thank | KELVEN

Perhaps because this journal only published 22 articles a year, the reviewers evaluated the papers very carefully. Although the impact factor of this journal published in Japan is not high, submitting to such a journal helped me a lot than submitting a domestic journal. From the review process and to the handling of the manuscript by the editor, one can see the gap in research and journal management between China and other countries.

(2) Thank | 南京E

Edit andThe reviewer was very serious, and he revised it three times. The logic of the draft was unclear, so the logic was clear, especially thanks.The first article written by myself to change my English article is considered to be a practice, and the effect is good!

(3) Thank | pavel