The processing speed of this journal is very impressive. After one month after sending for review, the review was completed. There were three experts. It took only more than 2 months from acceptance after revised submission to online publication. The logistic services were also very efficient, and emails were basically responded on the same day. The submission and review system is the most comfortable one I have ever used. I feel that IF will continue to rise, and many experts will publish on it.

(3) Thank | 白衣大虾

Two papers were accepted after revisions. The editor was serious, and the publication fee was a bit expensive.

(5) Thank | Fukai

I feel love and hate for this journal. Originally a lab member suggested submitting to this journal. They say it is fast. I didn’t think they were fast, but this journal gave me the opportunity. I will recommend other lab member to contribute.

(2) Thank | 曼爱生物

Reducing the weight didn't help much either, even after reducing it to 16%, it still didn't pass the initial review. I don't understand where the problem lies, and it hasn't even reached the editors yet.

(0) Thank | Jary

Still rejected, may need the original data?

(0) Thank | HH G

Recently, I am unable to access the Frontiers official website and can't see the review status. Does anyone else have this issue?

(0) Thank | 我就康康不说话

Have you reapplied now? What is your current status?

(0) Thank | Jary

The system may have detected a high repetition rate, so it did not provide it to the editor. Let's lower the repetition rate to 20 and try again. That's how I am now.

(0) Thank | HH G

The reply similar to yours has a repetition rate of 27%, it is also a template rejection. Inquiries are also not answered, it never even reaches the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | Jary

Instant rejection, may I ask the reason for the rejection? Is it due to a fixed format? I noticed the first "principle of good faith" and it may be a problem of article repetition, with a 23% repetition rate. Most of the repetition is in the methods section. Do I need to make changes before resubmitting? I have requested detailed reasons for rejection from the editorial department, please help me out.

(0) Thank | HH G

May I ask what happened next?

(0) Thank | wodetang

May I ask if there have been any further developments?

(0) Thank | wodetang

The editor has been assigned for more than ten days, but there has been no new action.

(0) Thank | BridgetWu

2025.1.3 Entered the production line process, initial assessment passed
2025.1.6 Agreed to reduce layout fees by 10%
2025.1.9 Paid layout fees
2025.1.13 Proofreading, the proofreader was very meticulous because there were many charts and the article was long, making the proofreading work complex. The proofreader made more than twenty proofreading suggestions, covering the entire article from title to references. It took several hours to carefully proofread and submit the proofread draft on the same day.
2025.1.21 The proof was reviewed and confirmed to be completed, and was scheduled for publication.
2025.1.23 Published.

(0) Thank | liuye

2025.1.3 Entered the production line process, initial evaluation passed.
2025.1.6 Agreed to reduce the layout fee by 10%.
2025.1.9 Paid the layout fee.
2025.1.13 Proofreading, the proofreading teacher is very careful, because there are many charts and the article is long, the proofreading work is complex. It may also be the reason for the late proofreading. The proofreading teacher proposed more than twenty proofreading suggestions, covering the entire article from title to references. Spent several hours carefully proofreading and submitted the proofreading draft on the same day.
2025.1.21 Proof confirmed and completed, scheduled for publication.
2025.1.23 Published.

(1) Thank | liuye

The magazine has a pretty fast pace, with publications coming out in less than three months from submission to acceptance. 

10/16: Submission
10/17: Request for original data
10/18: Resubmission, realizing original data was not translated, emailed magazine for re-submission
10/23: Magazine agrees
10/24: Resubmission
10/25: Initial Validation
10/26: Editorial Assignment
11/11: Independent Review
11/18: Major revisions based on first reviewer's feedback
11/20: Minor revisions based on third reviewer's feedback
11/25: Interactive Review, second reviewer disappears without submitting feedback
12/5: Submitted revised manuscript, first reviewer agrees to publication 36 minutes later
12/7: Second reviewer agrees to publication, enters Review Finalized stage
12/31: Editorial team changes, new editor requests manuscript to be revised and resubmitted according to reviewer feedback, despite already making previous revisions
1/2/2025: Enters Final Validation, accepted 1 hour later, initiates request for discount on publication fees on the system.

(0) Thank | liuye

From submitting the paper starting from February 8th to being accepted in early June, it took about 4 months. There were a total of 3 reviewers who were quite diligent and responsible, providing many suggestions. We made gradual revisions based on their feedback, and ultimately the paper was successfully accepted!

(0) Thank | duoduo

What makes me most comfortable is that I can see the review comments of F company in real time, without having to wait for all the comments to come back and rush to make changes. I can make some changes in advance and the time for rework is still quite short, so there is room for adjustment.

(0) Thank | 九嶷

Brief review, the first attempt of an undergraduate student. The initial draft was not very good, but the editor gave me a chance to revise it several times. It took about 3 and a half months to be accepted, and another half a month to be published. It didn't feel as fast as others had mentioned. The review comments were 2224 4443, and the reviewer's feedback seemed very fair to me at my level.

(0) Thank | 九嶷

Wasted three months, three reviewers finally accepted two of them, and one provided some comments. Just as I was about to respond to the last comment, the editor suddenly rejected me... speechless.

(0) Thank | river1999

2024.11.22 Independent Review >>>  Interactive Review
2024.11.23 A new review report has been submitted by a Reviewer 4
05 Dec 2024 Submitting Author ...... posted new comments.

(1) Thank | river1999

Reviewer 2: 2 2 3 3 major revision
Reviewer 3: 3 3 4 4 major revision
Reviewer 4: 2 5 1 1 major revision

(0) Thank | river1999

2024.9.11 submit → Initial Validation
2024.9.12 Initial Validation → Editorial Assignment
2024.9.24 Editorial Assignment → Independent Review
2024.10.11 A new review report has been submitted by a Reviewer 2
2024.11.8 Reviewer 1 withdrawn
2024.11.18 A new review report has been submitted by a Reviewer 3
2024.11.22 Interactive review forum activated.
2024.11.23 A new review report has been submitted by a Reviewer 4

(0) Thank | river1999

Excuse me, how long did the first step of the review take?

(0) Thank | hasuhasu

From submission to acceptance, it took 4 months.

(0) Thank | SCI中啊