The processing speed of this journal is very impressive. After one month after sending for review, the review was completed. There were three experts. It took only more than 2 months from acceptance after revised submission to online publication. The logistic services were also very efficient, and emails were basically responded on the same day. The submission and review system is the most comfortable one I have ever used. I feel that IF will continue to rise, and many experts will publish on it.

(3) Thank | 白衣大虾

Two papers were accepted after revisions. The editor was serious, and the publication fee was a bit expensive.

(5) Thank | Fukai

I feel love and hate for this journal. Originally a lab member suggested submitting to this journal. They say it is fast. I didn’t think they were fast, but this journal gave me the opportunity. I will recommend other lab member to contribute.

(2) Thank | 曼爱生物

1. It has been two months since the Initial Validation.

(0) Thank | Aoxing

Translation:

To accumulate merit and do good deeds for oneself in the future = =

Received date: 04 Apr 2025
Editorial assignment start date: 04 Apr 2025
Independent review start date: 23 Apr 2025
Review finalized date: 07 May 2025
Final validation date: 08 May 2025

(0) Thank | 孤鸿踏雪

The submitted paper is a review article.
Received date: 18 Feb 2025
Editorial assignment start date: 19 Feb 2025
Independent review start date: 25 Mar 2025
Interactive review activated date: 03 Apr 2025
Review finalized date: 13 May 2025
Final validation date: 23 May 2025

(0) Thank | BridgetWu

The submission system is very good, with timely feedback. One downside is that the uploaded charts need to be manually dragged to reorder, otherwise the sequence will be messed up.

(0) Thank | Weibin

After two months of review, the reviewer disappeared. Unable to find the reviewer, the editor suggested submitting to a different journal.

(0) Thank | 彬

It's already the 8th day of RF, but there's still no news from the editors. I don't know what's going on. Jiaoling is anxious to graduate. I hope the editors can show mercy.

(0) Thank | BridgetWu

I recently submitted to this journal, and after reaching the final review stage, it was sent back to me for revisions. After inviting reviewers again and making revisions, it was sent back to me again at the final review stage. I'm not sure what's going on. The journal seems to be having some issues recently.

(0) Thank | hasuhasu

I submitted on 2.15 and only found the AE on 4.15, but the AE was super efficient. I entered the interactive review on 4.21, revised on 4.28, and was directly accepted on 4.30.

(0) Thank | 林彬TJ

Any progress? It's been almost two months since my Editorial Assignment, but there hasn't been any movement yet.

(0) Thank | ZZKE

It's been almost two months since the editorial assignment, and there's still no progress. What should I do? Should I write a letter to inquire about it? Will it be rejected?

(0) Thank | ZZKE

Reducing the weight didn't help much either, even after reducing it to 16%, it still didn't pass the initial review. I don't understand where the problem lies, and it hasn't even reached the editors yet.

(0) Thank | Jary

Still rejected, may need the original data?

(0) Thank | HH G

Recently, I am unable to access the Frontiers official website and can't see the review status. Does anyone else have this issue?

(0) Thank | 我就康康不说话

Have you reapplied now? What is your current status?

(0) Thank | Jary

The system may have detected a high repetition rate, so it did not provide it to the editor. Let's lower the repetition rate to 20 and try again. That's how I am now.

(0) Thank | HH G

The reply similar to yours has a repetition rate of 27%, it is also a template rejection. Inquiries are also not answered, it never even reaches the hands of the editor.

(0) Thank | Jary

Instant rejection, may I ask the reason for the rejection? Is it due to a fixed format? I noticed the first "principle of good faith" and it may be a problem of article repetition, with a 23% repetition rate. Most of the repetition is in the methods section. Do I need to make changes before resubmitting? I have requested detailed reasons for rejection from the editorial department, please help me out.

(0) Thank | HH G

May I ask what happened next?

(0) Thank | wodetang

May I ask if there have been any further developments?

(0) Thank | wodetang

The editor has been assigned for more than ten days, but there has been no new action.

(0) Thank | BridgetWu

2025.1.3 Entered the production line process, initial assessment passed
2025.1.6 Agreed to reduce layout fees by 10%
2025.1.9 Paid layout fees
2025.1.13 Proofreading, the proofreader was very meticulous because there were many charts and the article was long, making the proofreading work complex. The proofreader made more than twenty proofreading suggestions, covering the entire article from title to references. It took several hours to carefully proofread and submit the proofread draft on the same day.
2025.1.21 The proof was reviewed and confirmed to be completed, and was scheduled for publication.
2025.1.23 Published.

(0) Thank | liuye

2025.1.3 Entered the production line process, initial evaluation passed.
2025.1.6 Agreed to reduce the layout fee by 10%.
2025.1.9 Paid the layout fee.
2025.1.13 Proofreading, the proofreading teacher is very careful, because there are many charts and the article is long, the proofreading work is complex. It may also be the reason for the late proofreading. The proofreading teacher proposed more than twenty proofreading suggestions, covering the entire article from title to references. Spent several hours carefully proofreading and submitted the proofreading draft on the same day.
2025.1.21 Proof confirmed and completed, scheduled for publication.
2025.1.23 Published.

(1) Thank | liuye