OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Mechanical Engineering |
47 / 631 | |
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Electrical and Electronic Engineering |
86 / 738 | |
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics |
28 / 211 | |
Category: Engineering Subcategory: Electronic, Optical and Magnetic Materials |
38 / 271 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: OPTICS | SCIE | Q2 | 32/119 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: OPTICS | SCIE | Q1 | 21/120 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
Nature Photonics | 266 | 54.20 |
Laser & Photonics Reviews | 94 | 14.20 |
OPTICS AND LASER TECHNOLOGY | 63 | 8.30 |
Chinese Optics Letters | 32 | 5.60 |
Journal of Luminescence | 104 | 6.70 |
OPTICS EXPRESS | 240 | 6.60 |
INFRARED PHYSICS & TECHNOLOGY | 56 | 5.70 |
OPTICS LETTERS | 244 | 6.60 |
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS | 123 | 6.40 |
JOURNAL OF NONLINEAR OPTICAL PHYSICS & MATERIALS | 30 | 3.00 |
Select your rating and start your review of OPTICS AND LASERS IN ENGINEERING
2025-02-12
01/15/2025 Submitted
01/18/2025 Under review (2/3/8)
02/08/2025 Decision in Process
02/10/2025 Major revision
Submitted on 01/15/2025
Under review on 01/18/2025 with 2 out of 8 reviewers responding
Decision in Process on 02/08/2025
Major revision requested on 02/10/2025
The paper was reviewed within three days and a decision was made within two days. The editorial team worked efficiently with an average review time of 2-3 weeks, reaching out to eight reviewers with three agreeing to review. In the end, feedback was received from two reviewers.
A two-week period was given for major revisions. Both reviewers provided positive feedback, with one providing only four suggestions and the other recommending acceptance with minor revisions. It is unclear why a major revision was ultimately requested.
2025-01-17
In general, this situation arises when there are conflicting review opinions. The editor is unable to make a decision, so another reviewer is added.
2025-01-12
Submission on 12.13.2024
We on 12.14.2024
Under review on 12.15.2024
Required reviews completed on 1.3.2024 (two reviews completed)
Under review again on 1.12.2024, is it rejected? Why did it go from required reviews completed to under review again?
2025-01-07
The submission was made in early October, and it was accepted for publication in early January 2025. The response time was quite fast.
2025-01-02
The journal review process is very efficient, with the longest time being spent "with editor". Here is a timeline for reference:
2024.10.23 submitted to journal
2024.10.25 with editor
2024.11.22 Under review
2024.12.08 Under review
2024.12.19 Decision in process
2024.12.23 Minor Revise
2024.12.29 With Editor (returned manuscript)
2024.1.1 Accept
2024-12-20
Submission on November 18, 2024
Two reviewers completed the review on December 16, 2024
Decision in Principle on December 20, 2024
(Continuously updated, wishing everyone good luck with acceptance!)
2024-12-06
Wait!
2024-12-01
Bro, what's the situation now?
2024-11-29
In terms of time, compared to OE, the review process will be slightly longer, but overall it is still relatively fast.
2024-11-29
The first round of major repairs is limited to 20 days. The second round was handed over for major repairs, mainly for text issues, and it seems to have been given 10 days. It was repaired for a week and then returned.