2023-12-29

Submitted on 2023.09.01
First revision on 2023.09.22
Revision on 2023.10.15
Accepted on 2023.11.12

2021-08-14

May I ask if this journal has corresponding authors? If there are corresponding authors, are they identified by the authors themselves or is it indicated in the text that the authors contribute equally? Thank you for your response.

2021-07-07

Submitted on February 9th, after one month, I received a notification for major revisions. There were two reviewers, the first reviewer had 30 questions, while the second reviewer had 11 questions. I answered each question one by one. One important experience I learned from this process is to answer exactly what the reviewers ask, avoiding unnecessary verbosity or brevity. The main goal is to address all the questions without any sense of complacency. I was given two months to complete the major revisions, which was quite a generous timeframe. After submission, I had to wait for another month. The first reviewer informed me that the paper would be accepted after minor revisions, while the second reviewer stated that major revisions were still needed. However, upon reviewing the feedback provided, I realized that most of the issues were related to formatting, which was manageable. I answered each question again and was given two more months. The questions were not difficult, and after one month, I resubmitted the revised paper, which was directly accepted. I was very excited because JQSRT is a reputable journal with recognized influence in the field. I have already published several papers in JQSRT, and I will continue to submit in the future.

Format: Single spacing is sufficient.

2021-04-20

Just recording the time, I just voted today.

2021-04-19

May I ask which editor did you choose for your submission? I also want to learn from your experience. Thank you.

2019-12-20

An article was just accepted in October. How does the journal become a Q3 journal now?

2019-05-17

The review speed was very fast for the result was given within one month. We submitted here for it was ranked in Q2. The editors were also very good. It took only 6 days from acceptance to pre-publication. I like this journal very much, and I will submit it again in the future.

2019-02-21

Top journals in the field of radiation heat transfer!Generally, there are three reviewers, all of whom are in the industry, and the basic knowledge is not solid. They are asked twice, and they have higher requirements for innovation and language.

2019-02-21

The top journal in the field of radiation heat transfer! Generally, there are 3 reviewers, all of whom are experts in the field. If you do not have a solid basic knowledge, and it is easy to get beat by their questions. They have high requirements for innovation and language.

2017-03-15

has high requirements for innovation, English, and content logic