ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH
Subject Area | Rank | Percentile |
---|---|---|
Category: Chemistry Subcategory: General Chemistry |
8 / 408 |
APC | APC Waiver | Other Charges |
---|---|---|
N/A | N/A | N/A |
Quartiles By JIF | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | SCIE | Q1 | 13/231 |
|
Quartiles By JCI | Collection | Quartile | Rank | Percentage |
Category: CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY | SCIE | Q1 | 38/231 |
|
Journal Title | h-index | CiteScore |
---|---|---|
CHEMICAL REVIEWS | 609 | 106.00 |
CHEMICAL SOCIETY REVIEWS | 432 | 80.80 |
Nature Chemistry | 187 | 29.60 |
ANGEWANDTE CHEMIE-INTERNATIONAL EDITION | 482 | 26.60 |
Journal of the American Chemical Society | 542 | 24.40 |
JOURNAL OF CONTROLLED RELEASE | 237 | 18.50 |
CHINESE CHEMICAL LETTERS | 41 | 14.10 |
GREEN CHEMISTRY | 186 | 16.10 |
ULTRASONICS SONOCHEMISTRY | 109 | 15.80 |
ChemSusChem | 130 | 15.80 |
Select your rating and start your review of ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH
2023-12-13
2022-03-30
Overview journals in the field of chemistry tend to favor large research groups that make outstanding contributions and produce a significant amount of work in their respective fields. The review process for articles is quick, with the first round of reviews typically taking around 15 days and involving three reviewers who are highly knowledgeable in the subject matter. Revisions are usually accepted within about a week. The editorial handling is very efficient.
2017-02-03
boss is the deputy editor of the ACS journal. Because of the invitation, it has been prepared for a period of time, submit at the end of October 2016, and returned to the review comments in December. Two minor changes, one rejected.As a result, the reviewer's comments were carefully answered, and the end of January was notified.Still quite smooth.ACR journals have to have a lot of influence on their own work, and then it is better for bosses to get invitations.
2016-09-13
After receiving the invitation, they discussed the organization manuscript with the collaborators, and they selectd on May 31, and they did not receive the review comments until August 12.Three reviewers, the comments were good, the discussion was revised and returned, and the reception was confirmed at the end of August.Overall, it is slower than the imaginary review, and it is not in line with the style of ACS. However, it may be the reason for review. It is relatively long and involves more content, so it is slower. Overall, editor and reviewer are more professional.The requirements are higher.
2016-07-06
I submitted my manuscript on November 20, 2015, and the review was returned on January 12, 2016. The three reviewers asked for minor revision. The editors stated that the manuscript did not meet the requirements of the journal and asked for a revision. According to the comments of reviewers and editors, I revised the literature and the article. During the period, I felt deeply that I had insufficient writing ability. The article was accepted on February 17, proofed on February 23, and published online on February 24.
2012-12-12
Briefly summarize the opinions of other bugs and express their feelings:
2011-08-20
Journal Homepage URL: http://pubs.acs.org/journal/achre4
2010-07-15