Let your research speak for itself

When preparing a manuscript for submission to a peer-reviewed journal, authors are often eager to emphasize the novelty and significance of their findings. However, this enthusiasm can sometimes lead to the inclusion of priority claims, such as assertions that their work is the “first” to achieve a particular result or explore a specific concept. While such statements might seem to strengthen the perceived impact of the research, they can, in fact, detract from its credibility and reception. Below, we discuss the reasons why authors should avoid priority claims and provide practical alternatives for emphasizing the significance of their work.

Risk of Unsupported Claims

Priority claims often lack adequate evidence and can be difficult to substantiate. Science is a cumulative process, with researchers around the world conducting studies and publishing findings simultaneously. It is virtually impossible to ensure that no other group has previously reported similar results, particularly given the variability in publication timelines across journals and regions. Unsubstantiated claims of priority can be challenged by reviewers or readers, potentially undermining the manuscript’s credibility.

Example to Avoid:
“To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate...”

Better Alternative:
“This study provides new insights into...”

The alternative emphasizes novelty without asserting exclusivity, reducing the risk of factual inaccuracies.

Potential for Alienating Readers
Bold priority claims can come across as presumptuous or dismissive of previous work. Acknowledging the contributions of others is a cornerstone of scientific integrity and fosters a collaborative atmosphere in the research community. Overlooking prior studies in favor of asserting priority may alienate readers, including reviewers who might perceive the manuscript as lacking thorough literature engagement.

Example to Avoid:
“This groundbreaking work establishes a completely new paradigm...”

Better Alternative:
“This work builds on prior studies to advance our understanding of...”

Framing the research as part of an ongoing dialogue highlights its value while respecting the contributions of others.

Scientific Humility Enhances Credibility
Science values humility. Authors who focus on presenting robust evidence and contextualizing their findings within the broader field are often viewed as more credible and trustworthy. This approach encourages a constructive exchange of ideas rather than competition for recognition.

Example to Avoid:
“We unequivocally establish that...”

Better Alternative:
“Our findings suggest that...”

The latter phrasing reflects humility while remaining confident in the study’s conclusions.

Journal and Reviewer Expectations
Many journals explicitly discourage or reject unsupported priority claims. Reviewers are likely to scrutinize such statements, especially in high-impact or competitive fields. By avoiding these claims, authors demonstrate a professional and objective approach to their work, increasing the likelihood of a favorable review process.

Fostering Reproducibility and Collaboration
Priority claims can inadvertently discourage reproducibility and collaboration, as they shift the focus from verifying and expanding on findings to staking claims. Instead, authors should highlight how their research can inspire future studies and address unanswered questions in the field. Using this framing encourages ongoing research and positions the study as a valuable contribution rather than a final word.

Avoiding priority claims in scientific manuscripts is not merely a matter of style but of professionalism and integrity. By focusing on presenting well-supported findings and situating them within the broader research landscape, authors can enhance the credibility, impact, and reception of their work. Remember, the goal of scientific writing is not only to report findings but also to contribute meaningfully to the ongoing dialogue in the field. Adopting a measured and collaborative tone ensures that your manuscript will be viewed as a valuable and credible contribution.