Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PLoS One

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PLoS One]Hello, you are Visitor Number 429523 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePLoS One
Journal Title AbbreviationsPLOS ONE
ISSN1932-6203
Impact Factor (2017-2018)2.766
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)6.00%
Official Websitehttp://www.plosone.org/home.action
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/default.asp
Open AccessYes
PublisherPUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE, 185 BERRY ST, STE 1300, SAN FRANCISCO, USA, CA, 94107
Subject AreaBiology
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyIrregular
Year Publication Started2006
Annual Article Volume20328
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1932-6203%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.6 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PLoS One】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)
  Reviews on PLoS One: Write a review
Author: 494212953@qq.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-12 14:10:55
Four months after receiving
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 494212953@qq.com

Author: 707145297@qq.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-11 18:40:20
The reviewer is very responsible, the review is quick, overhauled, and directly hired after minor repairs.Still very lucky to cast the first draft.Ha ha...Go ahead, come on!Share it together: 725554986
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 707145297@qq.com

Author: zhjyq129


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-10 09:19:22
decision in progress After 40 days of recruitment
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhjyq129

Author: zhjyq


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-20 09:54:59
minor review After becoming decision in progress 1 month, what is the situation, is not to be rejected
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | zhjyq

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-14 03:04:46
The famous Big Mac water magazine, more than 20,000 articles a year, is a general magazine 50-80 yearsArticle volume
Show Review in Original Language
(61) Thank | 匿名

Author: Hu


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 7.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-13 14:28:37
This journal is not bad. I voted for two articles, one was rejected, one was overhauled, and many opinions were revised. It is very professional and I have improved my document.At the same time, the publication was not long before the paper was cited many times by other journals, which made me feel that the influence of this journal is still good. At least I personally feel more exposed than traditional non-open source journals...I feel more able to show my research results to my colleagues at home and abroad...
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Hu

Author: tmd1880


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 01:52:08
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tmd1880

Author: wxling07@163.com


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-30 06:56:33
This journal does not want the legendary water, it is indeed very fast.Submitted on January 20th, February 21st, minor revision, returned to revision on April 8th, April 29th, accepted.The review comments were very strict and academically strong, giving a full three-page opinion.Every little detail in the paper, editors and reviewers are not overlooked, very strict.But it is not the legendary failure to pay attention to the original innovation, the scientific significance and innovative requirements of the paper is still quite high!Refueling Plos one
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wxling07@163.com

Author: 1111


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-29 15:50:38
Waited for 5 months, and the school actually did not count the journals. There is no way to retract the papers. When you submit the papers, you must look at the school’s requirements. Is there any?Pull down the school blacklist.The water magazine is well mixed, but the school does not necessarily recognize
Show Review in Original Language
(21) Thank | 1111

Author: zhjyq


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-21 08:26:00
Seeing that there are a lot of retraction notices, what is the situation?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | zhjyq

Author: paper123


Subject Area: Management
Duration of Peer Review: 12.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-18 08:47:07
period modification and modification, it took a year to finally hire
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | paper123

Author: rabbitzxy@163.com


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-17 06:24:32
2019, submitted on April 3, the revision of the draft in early May, repaired soon after the revision, and received the acceptance notice on May 17.In general, it is still very smooth. The key is to indicate the recommended reviewers to facilitate the positioning of the magazine.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | rabbitzxy@163.com

Author: Riven


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:29
Waiting is really a torment, the first trial is not easy to end, I did not expect to come to a second trial, but also in the foreseeable, it has been almost a month.......
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Riven

Author: Riven


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 20:37:23
Waiting is really a torment, it is not easy to get a trial.At the end, I didn't expect to have a second trial. It was still in the foreseeable future. It has been almost a month.......
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Riven

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 8.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-05-14 16:43:28
also encountered journal editors inaction, reminded and reminded.Admit that his level is limited, the paper can only be degraded to this journal, but the process is extremely testable, patient experience, experienced a year, six reminders, each reminder.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 匿名

Author: tmdztr


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-30 11:46:57
俺 is almost 4 months old, and today the academic editor told you that 10 invitations for review were declined, no one tried.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | tmdztr

Author: pffwfp@163.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-13 08:13:34
I submitted PLOS ONE on October 30, 17th, and the status update was under review on January 2, 2018. In the middle two months, I said that I was conducting academic quality review and looking for editors, then went to 2018.On April 13th, it is still under review. I sent an e-mail on April 4th to ask what the situation said. The editor said that the academic editor was unavailable, and said that once an academic editor is available, the review comments will be sent back.Give it to me, because without academic editors, because of confidentiality issues, you can't directly return to the reviewed opinions.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | pffwfp@163.com

Author: aaaa


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 4.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-10 09:15:02
submitted for more than one month to enter the external audit, the external audit has been three months, and the e-mail editor has not yet found the external auditor, in a pseudo-external state.Then I received an apology letter from the academic editor, hoping to have a good result.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | aaaa

Author: y


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-29 16:11:00
heard that it is one of the four major water issues.The monthly publications are over 1000, which is a bit exaggerated.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | y

Author: 972639419@qq.com


Subject Area: Geoscience
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:54:02
is too pitted. After one month, I went into the under review. After two months, I was notified that the academic editor could not use it. I have to find an academic editor again!I haven't sent it out for so long.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 972639419@qq.com

Author: 4117


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-13 15:40:46
is normal.It’s only 50 days later, Under Review.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 4117

Author: LA


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-10 22:45:08
would like to ask, submitted for 4 weeks, or editor invited, normal?
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | LA

Author: pls8151


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:46:53
俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations.
Show Review in Original Language
(20) Thank | pls8151

Author: pls8151


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 5.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-21 04:45:58
俺Submit 3 times, both cups.I also reviewed it three times and also put someone else's cup.Generally speaking, the innovations in the rules and regulations are more acceptable, especially in the big framework.Anti-traditional innovation is not accepted in general magazines, and most editors of PLOS ONE are also conservative.There are not many papers that can stand up to others' comments. Just like government officials, there are not many anti-corruption and anti-corruption investigations.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | pls8151

Author: Hank


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-12-23 03:17:39
Submission is simple and smooth, minor repair is on
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Hank

First    Previous    1    2    3    4    5    6    Next    Last  (To Page
/6)

Start your review of [PLoS One]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.