Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

Polymer Chemistry

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[Polymer Chemistry]Hello, you are Visitor Number 96306 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePolymer Chemistry
Journal Title AbbreviationsPOLYM CHEM-UK
ISSN1759-9954
Impact Factor (2017-2018)4.927
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)14.90%
Official Websitehttp://pubs.rsc.org/en/journals/journalissues/py
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://mc.manuscriptcentral.com/py
Open AccessNo
PublisherROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY, THOMAS GRAHAM HOUSE, SCIENCE PARK, MILTON RD, CAMBRIDGE, ENGLAND, CAMBS, CB4 0WF
Subject AreaPOLYMER SCIENCE
Country/Area of PublicationENGLAND
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started2010
Annual Article Volume758
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1759-9954%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 1.3 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 88%
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【Polymer Chemistry】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)
  Reviews on Polymer Chemistry: Write a review
Author: wolfe


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-04 07:41:29
All said that the PC is very fast, and the same day with the editor,I haven’t sent it for review in a week, it’s not scientific, I’m willing to submit it for good luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | wolfe

Author: 喵喵


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-07-03 13:57:54
2018.3.6 Submission2018.4.5 Overhaul2018.6.4 Repair2018.6.12 Receive 6.20 onlineThe editing efficiency is super high, very nice.Unfortunately, this year's impact factor has dropped a lot.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 喵喵

Author: 灰


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-04-30 17:36:38
acs macro lettersThree reviewers in BC, eventually rejected, the second proposal to cast a synthetic magazinePC submitted for review on the same day, 4 weeks for review comments, three reviewers, editors gave overhaul, but less need to make up the experiment, only twoAfter two weeks of repair, receive, but need to change the languageTwo days after the repair, officially received48h proof after two daysLook two or three days after returning onlineOverall, it's really fast!!The first one is a sci, very happy, sharing ~~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 灰

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-19 17:18:14
is quite good, after the completion of the minor repair directly
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | 匿名

Author: 人家热


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-03 11:35:28
paralyzed.The Chinese deputy editor of Dog Day actually turned around advance
Show Review in Original Language
(15) Thank | 人家热

Author: A$AP


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-23 11:34:35
See the sharing experience of everyone, and choose this in the fast principle.The first review was very quick, and it was back in ten days, but the opinions of the two reviewers were extremely different. The key was that the first reviewer did not understand anything.So I found a third reviewer, but I just caught up with Christmas and delayed for a while. The review comments came back on January 19th (in fact, I reviewed the draft for forty days).The third reviewer's attitude is a bit ambiguous. I feel that although there is polymer synthesis but more emphasis on analysis, let me switch to chromatographic a and analytical chemistry.Finally edited the transfer to advance.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | A$AP

Author: 炎冰子


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-01-16 12:28:08
Observed a group of interesting assembly phenomena, the data is incomplete, but it is difficult to characterize, CC is rejected by the second, and then the PC's communication.The editing process is fast, and the reviewers are also very strong.One of the reviewers clearly pointed out the various deficiencies in the experiment and proposed supplementary data.However, because the system is special, the common methods cannot be characterized, so it is only explained.I thought it would be rejected, but the reviewer received it directly after the trial.From submission to reception, less than a month and a half, half of the time was delayed in finding test methods.The editing process is very fast, and the reviewer is professional. If there is any new idea, it can still accept some deficiencies in the representation.Submission: 2017-12-3Return to modify comments: 2017-12-20 (overhaul)Submit again: 2018-1-11Receive: 2018-1-15
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 炎冰子

Author: 狂野小驴


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-11-16 15:46:52
has just invested in communication chemistry communication, it has been 7 days, still no results.Always with the editior state.Nervous.When will I become in peer review?At least give a chance to submit a trial
Show Review in Original Language
(5) Thank | 狂野小驴

Author: zhangfeilong0211@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-11-13 16:42:07
just cast an article, if in the scattered gold coin
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | zhangfeilong0211@163.com

Author: morchid


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-29 23:46:18
is not bad, the review speed is very fast, and the quick surprise is unexpected
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | morchid

Author: chenhjoe@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-10 08:36:22
The journal has very requirements for the novelty of the article, the data is comprehensive, and the data supports the conclusion; in view of the polymer synthesis and the new ideas of the paper, the performance requirements of the device (optoelectronic device) are not high.For the field pioneering concept papers, the rate of collection is fast!Is a good journal!
Show Review in Original Language
(23) Thank | chenhjoe@163.com

Author: tianyaguzhao@zju.edu.cn


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-06-10 02:26:48
Submission to reply to modify comments less than 2 weeks, two reviewers, one person a question, I modified the next day to send back, the third day to receive, a total of less than 3 weeks.This efficiency.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | tianyaguzhao@zju.edu.cn

Author: 小伟子


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-03 15:29:43
said that the review speed is very fast, I will believe it..As a result, the entire process went down two months and five days..However, I feel that it is okay and it went online smoothly.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小伟子

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-01 12:05:00
The first submission, 15 days after reviewing comments, three people, one refused, one received directly, one minor repair; made up a little experiment, returned after 20 days, received after 3 days!Very speed, editing is also very good, I think the data still needs to be full ~
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-31 19:21:00
speed is still very fast.The first time to vote for 20 days to the news, overhaul.Then I caught up with a series of holidays such as the Mid-Autumn Festival and the National Day. The data was added to the delay. It took about a month to complete the data.The editorial department there was urging.Received again one week after the vote.I feel that their speed is still quite fast, and the editors are very good and responsible.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-10-21 15:09:00
is not that easy.I changed it three times and wanted to cry, but I was admitted.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-26 16:23:00
The first PC experienced a long process of refusal - re-investment - minor repair - reception, etc., used two and a half months before and after.After the second post was cast for 10 days, the two reviewers were recommended for publication after the minor repairs. It was only two weeks after the summer vacation that they returned to comment.I returned to the Internet on the same day and asked if I wanted to make a back cover.It feels that the IF value is still falling, and the quality is not high.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 16:47:00
Although IF changed from 5.321 to 5.231, it is still the preferred weapon for me to choose Dr. Silk.After the rejection of the macromolecules, according to the review comments, the experimental experiment was added to the polym chem, and the editor of the Chinese region, Professor Hu Wenping (thanks to Professor Hu, huh, huh), after three weeks, the review comments were minor repairs, and the reforms were repeated.Accept, online again after one week.In general, the difficulty and macromolecules are not on one level (another piece of data in this group is quite ok, and later attacked macromolecules, the first reviewer's comments were directly published or minor repairs, and the second reviewer felt that there was no new idea, refusedSo tragedy).
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-08-05 15:35:00
The first time I voted out for almost three weeks, I refused to reply, mainly because of the language problem; after the second revision, I received it just one week later, and the speed was slightly faster...
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-21 13:35:00
cast an article a few days ago, if you can publish, loose gold coins 500!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-21 10:50:00
2012: IF=5.3212013: IF=5.231
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-03 10:45:00
The article is reflected very quickly, will be processed the next day after submission; then the editor will turnGive 3 reviewers and ask reviewers to reply within 2 weeks; 4.3 submissions, 5.6 received revision notices, major changes, and three editors raised many questions, each with an average of 7 or so, reviewing draftsPeople are very serious, although there is a problem that is very difficult to ask, but the problem is very professional; the 5.23 return, re-under review, the editor continues to request comments within 2 weeks; 6.3 received, there is an editorAlso added a question based on the response.Overall, the magazine feels very quick, and the level of reviewers is relatively high and serious.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-26 22:22:00
The first SCI, received by polym.chem., share it:
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-20 15:35:00
Submit for three daysLetter! The deputy editor directly refused! It is really fast! It seems that the impact factor is really difficult to vote for more!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-12-01 09:26:00
The review speed is very fast, 10 days of opinions will come back, 2The reviewers suggested that they were received after minor repairs. The problem was very simple. It took four days (the actual 2 days changed, the boss suspected that the modification was less), the upload was modified, the result is still unknown. PS: The impact factor is very high!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    3    Next    Last  (To Page
/3)

Start your review of [Polymer Chemistry]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.