Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

PHYSICAL REVIEW A

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[PHYSICAL REVIEW A]Hello, you are Visitor Number 60795 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitlePHYSICAL REVIEW A

(According to the latest JCR data, the ISSN of this journal was changed to 2469-9926, which is now indexed in the JCR.)
Journal Title AbbreviationsPHYS REV A
ISSN1050-2947
Impact Factor (2017-2018)0.000
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)100.00%
Official Websitehttp://pra.aps.org/
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://authors.aps.org/esubs/gateway/essubmit
Open AccessNo
PublisherAMER PHYSICAL SOC, ONE PHYSICS ELLIPSE, COLLEGE PK, USA, MD, 20740-3844
Subject AreaPhysics
Country/Area of PublicationUNITED STATES
Publication FrequencyMonthly
Year Publication Started1990
Annual Article Volume2666
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=1050-2947%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.1 month(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: Difficult
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【PHYSICAL REVIEW A】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)
  Reviews on PHYSICAL REVIEW A: Write a review
Author: dekcuf


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-18 22:57:51
Many comments on the physical reviewCan only be poorly graduated from the foundation, when the emperor's new clothes.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | dekcuf

Author: tmd3632


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 6.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-06-03 23:04:10
俺 was rejected by arxiv and requested to be published in the physical review:Dear xxxxxxxx,Our moderators are not willing to reconsider this decision unless this article is first published. they suggested first publishing in phys rev a, and after that has occurred, you could resubmit for reconsideration.-----Arxiv moderation
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | tmd3632

Author: 7767


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-02-28 16:53:08
The editor and editor of this magazine is very corrupt.Pull the gang to fight, revenge, no bottom line.
Show Review in Original Language
(7) Thank | 7767

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:49:08
07 Contributed on December 30, 2008, and returned to the review opinion on January 13, 2008.
      Advantages: In general, the whole cycle is relatively short, belonging to the PR series of journals, the mainstream journals of physics, the quality is good.
       Insufficient place: As a reviewer, if the reviewer says NO, then reject, is it a pity?
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 匿名

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:47:19
APS is the main journal of physics, although the influence factor of PRA is always around 3, but its volume is large.And maintaining such a high impact factor is enough to prove its quality and strength.As a physics researcher, the PR series of papers is worthy of recognition, and its authority is beyond doubt.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 匿名

Author: a12


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:45:24
waiting····
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | a12

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:44:05
was rejected again....
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 匿名

Author: invincible god


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:22:00
The review period is approximately 50 days.Two reviewers, one suggested to receive, and the other said that they need to be revised before considering.The language requirements are relatively high, and after the modification, it is accepted within 3 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | invincible god

Author: 1374510361@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:20:16
The review period is approximately 50 days.Two reviewers, one suggested to receive, and the other said that they need to be revised before considering.The language requirements are relatively high, and after the modification, it is accepted within 3 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 1374510361@qq.com

Author: 1374510361@qq.com


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-06-15 22:20:09
The review period is approximately 50 days.Two reviewers, one suggested to receive, and the other said that they need to be revised before considering.The language requirements are relatively high, and after the modification, it is accepted within 3 days.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | 1374510361@qq.com

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-04-19 09:08:36
PHYSICAL REVIEW A Is there a limit on the number of submissions?It used to be very long. Now there are word limit restrictions in the official website author guide, PRL 3750, PRB 3500, PRA 4500?Http://journals.aps.org/authors/length-guide
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 匿名

Author: sciencewatch


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Rejected


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-10 15:56:00
Generally speaking, if the innovation result does not conflict with the interests of the editor or board member, they can handle it fairly..If there is a conflict, it is very corrupt.I have written several Commentes and criticized the wrong opinions of some members of the editorial board. I did not give the original editorial board members a reply and used my excuse to take my back and cover each other.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | sciencewatch

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 12:40:00
PRA The latest impact factor of SCI in 2013 is 3.042, which has already broken through the 3.0 mark!
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-06-01 10:15:00
APS is the main journal of physics. Although the influence factor of PRA is always around 3, it has a large amount of manuscripts, and it can prove its quality and strength by maintaining such a high impact factor.As a physics researcher, the PR series of papers is worthy of recognition, and its authority is beyond doubt.
Show Review in Original Language
(3) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-18 20:31:00
07 December 30 submission, return to the review comments on January 13, 2008, after the minor repair on the 17th.Officially published on February 27.Advantages: In general, the whole cycle is relatively short, belonging to the PR series of journals, the mainstream journals of physics, the quality is good.Insufficient place: As a reviewer, if the reviewer says NO, then reject, is it a pity?
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-02 09:38:00
The reviewer I encountered was a bit slow, but the reviewer was very serious and cast an article. The result was received after the revision, and it was revised according to the review comments.One drawback is that the editor only finds one reviewer at a time.If you agree, you will find a new reviewer after the evaluation is not good. At this time, you will find at least two.So sometimes it is slower.High expectations.Recently voted for an article, bless yourself!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Information Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-10-31 17:19:00
voted three times, the first time I refused, but gave a lot of opinions, and finally JPB published, the second time was originally hoped, although our ideas are very new, justThe reviewer did not agree with one of our statements. Finally, it was published in the EPL. The third time was very smooth, but the abstract did not write a new idea. After the minor repair, I published a few articles in
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-08-20 17:10:00
, a very good magazine.The requirement for novelty is not very high, but the things to be done are as comprehensive as possible.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Mathematical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2011-05-04 15:57:00
PRA has been one of the mainstream journals of APS and has always been authoritative.The article is also more difficult to publish.Although several articles have been published on it, there are several self-perceptions that can be used to rush PRL.There are some reviewers, some are slow, and it depends on the reviewer. There was an article on which eight reviewers were changed.Of course, the fastest one time a week to accept.If you don't have strong originality, it is very difficult to send it on.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 原子与分子物理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-25 09:08:00
Review is strict, hit rate is low
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 量子光学
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-08-11 09:08:00
Edit, reviewers are very serious If you are not a cow, the first draft is a little bit wrong, otherwise, ifThe comments from the first reviewer are too good, and the editor will find more reviewers to review.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-22 10:52:00
Just like all professional journals, the journals of various majors in the United States are basically the mainstream journals in this direction. The PR series under the APS category is also the mainstream PRL of the physical category including all directions, while PRAIt is biased towards atoms, molecules and optical parts. For the quantum optics I do, PRA is the mainstream journal in this respect. The papers I read are basically relatively small in other journals on PRL and PRA
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: 原子分子物理
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-16 16:35:00
APS Journal, in addition to PRL, the preferred journal
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2010-07-16 14:58:00
can be regarded as a sub-publication of Phys Rev Lett. For most people, PRL is still a dream, a more realistic goal.I am trying to get a few more PRAs.The PRA magazine adheres to the rigorous characteristics of the APS series of journals. Most of the reviewers are very serious. In most cases, the review speed is very fast, and the review comments will greatly help the article.
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    Next    Last  (To Page
/1)

Start your review of [PHYSICAL REVIEW A]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.