Scientific Editing Services, Manuscript Editing Service
中文 繁體中文 English 한국어 日本語 Português Español

JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A

Browse Journals by Title


Journal name:   ISSN:   Subject area:   Impact factor range: -
Index:   Category:   Open Access:   Sort by:

[JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A]Hello, you are Visitor Number 92066 on this page.

Journal Profile
Journal TitleJOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A
Journal Title AbbreviationsJ CHROMATOGR A
ISSN0021-9673
Impact Factor (2017-2018)3.716
Self-Citation Ratio (2017-2018)17.90%
Official Websitehttp://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/502688/description#description
Online Manuscript Submissionhttp://ees.elsevier.com/chroma/
Open AccessNo
PublisherELSEVIER SCIENCE BV, PO BOX 211, AMSTERDAM, NETHERLANDS, 1000 AE
Subject AreaChemistry
Country/Area of PublicationNETHERLANDS
Publication FrequencyWeekly
Year Publication Started0
Annual Article Volume897
Indexing (SCI or SCIE)Science Citation Index
Science Citation Index Expanded
Link to PubMed Central (PMC)http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nlmcatalog?term=0021-9673%5BISSN%5D
Average Duration of Peer Review *Data from Authors: About 2.7 month(s)
Data from Elsevier: Average 8.5 Week(s)
Competitiveness *Data from Authors: 66%
Online Article Publication TimeData from Elsevier: Average 4.7 Week(s)
Useful Links
Relevant Journals 【JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A】Impact Factor Trend
Comments from Authors
*All review process metrics, such as acceptance rate and review speed, are limited to our user-submitted manuscripts. As such they may not reflect the journals' exact competitiveness or speed.
  • Journals in the Same Subject Area
  • Impact Factor Trend


First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)
  Reviews on JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A: Write a review
Author: hahaha


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2018-03-15 20:39:26
Chromatography A speed is really fast!thank you very much!Received in a month and a few days!I wish the journal is getting better and better!
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | hahaha

Author: jzj55


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-09-01 22:35:34
3 months, how come there is no news, it is too slow now, the reminder is useless, the editor simply ignores me
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jzj55

Author: DIDN


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-25 08:57:50
2017.7.12 Submitted Journal
 7.13 under review8.15 moderate revision8.23 submitted to the journal, under review, modified for seven days8.24 acceptedThe article is creative, novel, the article is very easy
Show Review in Original Language
(8) Thank | DIDN

Author: DIDN


Subject Area: Life Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-08-01 22:00:58
Submitted in 7.12 last month, review after 2 days, review in the middle, 8.1 today review, the first time to vote for this journal, hope to have a good result, graduate student second SCI
Show Review in Original Language
(6) Thank | DIDN

Author: jzj


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Pending & Unknown


Write a review

Reviewed 2017-07-29 10:43:26
How is the speed so slow now, it's been two months, there is no message##id-Sp##29784
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | jzj

Author: 小药


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 2.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-08-02 20:31:26
Weekly, the ratio of employment is high.There are high quality papers and there are quite a few hydrology.The impact factor continues to decline.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 小药

Author: 13840149878@163.com


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2016-03-02 09:30:22
Received at Editorial Office: 5 Nov 2015Moderate revision: 30 Nov 2015Article revised: 22 Dec 2015Article accepted for publication: 28 Dec 2015Received at Elsevier: 30 Dec 2015JCA's efficiency is well-deserved, 25-day review, because of other delays, 23 days after submitting the return draft, and then submit the time to 3 days before Christmas, the total should be a while before there is news, the result is after ChristmasI received the message in 3 days and I am very happy!Really praise!
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | 13840149878@163.com

Author: 匿名


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 1.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted after revision


Write a review

Reviewed 2015-08-04 02:47:01
07-06 Submitted to Journal07-07 Under Review07-17 Moderate Revision (Review only took 10 days, two reviewers, 7 and 5 small comments respectively)07-28 Revisions Submitted to Journal08-03 AcceptIt took less than a month from submission to reception (I modified it for 10 days).JCA editing is extremely efficient.An editor was selected at the time of submission, and the manuscript was assigned to another editor, Dr. Poole.
Show Review in Original Language
(4) Thank | 匿名

Author: 阿斯顿


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 3.0 month(s)
Result: Accepted directly


Write a review

Reviewed 2014-12-05 06:37:12
J CHROMATOGR A The magazine level is not bad, but the magazine is still quite well known internationally.The old magazine in the Journal of Analytical Chemistry.I have been rejected several times, and I have already passed it. I have to say that it is OK. As long as there are better innovations in the article, I have the opportunity to be hired!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | 阿斯顿

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-11-18 22:57:00
cast an article last year, in terms of multi-dimensional biochromatography, I think it has some innovation, and it will be repaired in about 20 days. Two reviewers, the first one is an acquaintance in this field, givingThe minor repair, the other is a foreigner, very serious, put forward a bunch of opinions and questions, but most of them are in the format of the icon, after repairing half a month later, minor repairs, change within 3 days, cast the next dayReceived.This magazine is very efficient. If the method has some innovation, you can try it. The hope is still quite big. The key is to prove the methodological evidence and verify the results. Introducing some biological experiments will add a lot of color. It should not be as difficult as Anal chem.Our laboratory has come out two more since I sent one.I wish you all the best!
Show Review in Original Language
(2) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-27 21:00:00
Submitted in February at the beginning of the year, reviewed for more than 3 months, rejected on May 21, one reviewer agreed to publish, another reviewer believed that the experimental design was unscientific, and the editor suggested changingAfter the heavy vote.Later, according to the editors and reviewers' opinions, the original single-factor experiment was replaced by orthogonal experiment, and the paper was completely revised. Resubmitted on August 26, Under review on the 29th; minor repair after about three weeks, return on September 24;On the 26th, due to a reference to the magazine abbreviation, he gave a minor repair, returned that day, and was just accepted today.It is the first big article in the doctoral period, and I personally think it is more innovative.The waiting process is anxious, and the minor repairs are modified as soon as possible. Try not to go to my own hand
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-09-04 23:06:00
to Germany, toss for nearly a year.7.31 was thrown out, and the conclusion of the first instance was received around 8.26: minor repair.Change 8.30 to the professor before leaving work.This morning, 9.4, the professor told us to accept.quite fast.IF is very satisfied, but it is getting more and more demanding.However, it is good to have acquaintances, and foreigners can't be excused.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Engineering and Materials
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-09 17:22:00
The level is uneven, and there are two articles in it. The first one has new ideas, and the second one is based on the gourd painting.The chromatographic material made.The helper reviewed two manuscripts, the first one, the acquaintance, and several comments to supplement the experiment, minor repairs; the other directly refused to do, the charts are not clear, the experiment is too water, more water than me, not refusedWhere is heaven??The boss did not want to refuse, and changed to overhaul.My first post, submitted less than a month, returned to the minor repair opinion, two minor repairs, one no opinion (in fact, not optimistic), returned less than one month to receive; the second post voted eight or nine weeks, two minor repairs, one refusedEngaged (no new ideas) are technical changes, return three days to accept; estimated two are two reviewers a
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-07-05 11:45:00
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2013-05-09 10:10:00
chromatographic direction classGood journals have always wanted to vote. Now, one month after submitting the manuscript, it is still under review. If you have a high degree of innovation in chromatographic direction, pre-processing and data processing, you can try the journal.After submitting the manuscript for three months, he has been repaired. Now the reviewer’s question is not easy to answer, but he still tried his best to answer it. There are 8 questions in total and he answered nearly 10 pages. I hope the reviewer can see it on my serious face.Don't refuse, haha.prayer.After the overhaul of the manuscript was uploaded, there was news after one week, and returned to the reviewer to re-review the manuscript. This reviewer only mentioned a few words with misspellings. Xiao Xiu, the editor asked the full text to be carefully examined, three days later.Modify the upload, accept it that day, luck is great.Editing speed is also very fast
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Medical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-11-29 16:22:00
8 The draft of the vote on the 31st of the month, the extraction aspect, the rejection letter received on October 10th, the speed is fairly fast, the opinions of the three editors, one suggestion to modifyTwo rejected, the comments are very detailed, the magazine has been revised after the change, in short, it is still a good magazine, the comments help a lot
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-10-14 20:17:00
contributed a total of three times: (1After the first submission, the review time is longer, mainly because the four reviewers are reviewing the manuscript. The return opinion is that two agree to publish, two objections are raised, and the result editor rejects the manuscript; (2) later based on the revised opinionThe paper was revised again, and it was cast again, and the fact that it was rejected before was mentioned in the cover letter.After a lengthy review, one of the dissident reviewers agreed to publish, and the other objected, and the editor gave the overhaul.I think that it is generally accepted to have a revised opinion. This revision is not so heart-warming.After the revised draft was submitted, the result was rejected.(3) This time, I had to honestly modify the opinions according to the opinions. After the revision was completed, I handed them over. This time I raised the objection
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-09-01 10:50:00
as the old-fashioned chromatography magazine, and its influence is not questioned.But to be honest, JCA's article levels are mixed.I voted for an LC/MS analysis last year and met a perverted reviewer who said that mass spectrometry could not identify the structure of a compound and was rejected.I added some corresponding experiments in accordance with the review comments, and then voted, and the editors gave it to the same abnormal reviewer. The result was rejected, and the reason was rather unpleasant.No way, I later changed the way I wrote it, and then I voted for ACA. The result was in the middle.Very happy.ACA is a bit higher than JCA's IF.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-08-29 16:40:00
The first submission was rejected for more than a month. Because the paper is very innovative, the editor suggested re-investment after revision and gave three reviewers' opinions.Thank you for the valuable opportunity given by the editor.I feel that the reviewer's opinion is really good. I re-edit the foreword according to the comments and add a lot of data.Resubmitted after 2 months.After submitting the manuscript, continue to submit the review, select the first reviewer, and add a new reviewer.One month after reviewing the manuscript, the former reviewer agreed to receive it, and the new reviewer made several small suggestions, and the editor asked Xiao Xiu.Two weeks after the second revision, I replied to the past.Received after one month.The journal is more innovative and requires a higher level of language and logic.Do a good job.There are still opportunities to be hired.Personal feeling journal quality is better than
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-07-17 13:35:00
Journal of chromatography A. After 3 weeks, I experienced a moderation revision, and after 3 weeks, I will repair it. After three days, the following is the status of the Journal of chromatography A submission.:5.23 Submitted to Journal5.24 Editor Invited 5.26 Sent Back to Author (highlight format has problems) 5.28 Change highlight format re-attack Technic
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area:
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-29 12:24:00
just saw someone say to take JCA test, huh, huh,Then I want to congratulate you, waiting to be rejected:) If your paper does not have a prominent novelty, even the editor can't pass.
Show Review in Original Language
(1) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-05-10 21:35:00
searched for an article published in the magazine in the last year, and it feels normal.Not comparable to analytical journals such as Talanta and ACA, ready to take the magazine to try their luck.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-25 22:29:00
finally accepted the submission in August last year, about 40 days to review, experts asked to add data, and then repeat.Then add the data to the head, and then overhaul, the experts gave detailed revisions, the editor is also very forceful, after careful revision, the second trial for 2 weeks, then minor repair, 2 weeks after the minor repair.Very good chromatography journals have high requirements for innovation.
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-04-02 21:38:00
Submission was rejected after 43 days, 2 minor repairs, one rejection, and the editor’s last rejection of the manuscript was that the analysis method was not much innovative, saying that they pursued the method’s novelty andSignificance, it is recommended to change to another suitable magazine.In fact, I thought about this problem before I voted, but I tried it. I don’t regret it~
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

Author: Anonymous


Subject Area: Chemical Science
Duration of Peer Review: 0.0 month(s)
Result:


Write a review

Reviewed 2012-03-06 22:37:00
should be regarded as the top magazine in the field of chromatography. It is highly professional and belongs to the old magazine with strong influence.The impact factor is slightly fluctuating but the overall change is not big!Because the influence is relatively large, the review is still relatively strict
Show Review in Original Language
(0) Thank | Anonymous

First    Previous    1    2    Next    Last  (To Page
/2)

Start your review of [JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A]:





Disclaimer: All information sourced directly from the journals is subject to change. Please use the journal homepage link to verify all information prior to submission.

Contact us

Contact us  

Your name*

Your email*

Your message*

Please fill in all fields and provide a valid email.