A total of two months, the reviewer was responsible and gave a lot of suggestions.Bruno editor is very nice

(1) Thank | Anonymous

the second FPT, a very smooth submission2018-3-18 submit2018-5-7 revise A major repair, a minor repair, a total of 16 questions, very professional, edit to a month to modify the time2018-5-25 submit The day of reception

(0) Thank | 875138719@qq.com

2.4 contribution, 3.24 repair, a direct hire, a major repair, editor-in-chief;3.29 repaired, 4.18 secondary repair, but also modified, there are several minor problems;4.22 repair, 5.1 acceptance, 5.2proof.In general, the quality of the journal is good, but the IF is not very high, the review period is slow, but it is very rigorous.I created a QQ group 146604124, welcome to share the consulting contribution experience

(0) Thank | 2360402617@qq.com

5-15 submit to journal5-16 with edtior5-17 under review6-27 revise (two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, edit to 15 days to modify the time)7-6 resubmit7-8 under review7-18 revise (through the review of the reviewer, the minor reviewer believes that there are two issues that need to be added to the text)7-19 resubmit7-20 accept7-25 proof

(2) Thank | 875138719@qq.com

5-15 submit to journal5-16 with edtior5-17 under review6-27 revise (two reviewers, one overhaul, one minor repair, edit to 15 days to modify the time)7-6 resubmit7-8 under review7-18 revise (through the review of the reviewer, the minor reviewer believes that there are two issues that need to be added to the text)7-19 resubmit7-20 accept7-25 proof

(1) Thank | 875138719@qq.com

After nearly half a year, a major repair, a minor repair, received more than one month after receiving, objective evaluation, feel that the editor is very friendly, reviewPeople are very responsible.The review speed is indeed a bit slow, but the quality of the journal is still very high.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

55 days after the submission of the first-instance opinion, the review comments are very professional..After 5 days of revision, submit the manuscript and receive it directly..The total time of sharing is 60 days..Efficiency is not worse than ACS...I feel that the editor is very friendly..(Editor is not my own choice, the magazine itself according to the content of the article to internal points)

(2) Thank | Anonymous

1.under review review cycle less than one month2. Executive Editor Dr. Bruno handles the manuscript very quickly and receives it quickly after returning to the manuscript.3. The journal is of a high level, and the author is very friendly. The recommended submission

(0) Thank | 123

I suggest you not to vote for this journal, the speed is not generally slow; I have not voted for half a year (or special issue).

(4) Thank | 1134719115@qq.com

I suggest you not to vote for this journal, the speed is not generally slow; I have not voted for half a year (or special issue).

(3) Thank | 1134719115@qq.com

by the way,

(0) Thank | 12

August 23, 2016 delivery, always shows with editor, September 24th state change, underReview, the status of the two months has not changed, until today, November 24, or under review.A reminder letter was sent to the editor without any reply.

(0) Thank | jipengmeng@163.com

SOFC Why do you directly say that the direction is not correct?so sad.

(0) Thank | Lea

The whole process goes through 5 months, although there are individual differences in the review time, but notI suggest that I am eager to graduate. I don't know if it is a coincidence. Many articles will go through 4~5 months, which is slower than the fuel and ACS journals.

(0) Thank | 游客

I sent a piece to the FPT at the end of January 2016, received the review results on February 15th, minor repairs, and then revised the submission on March 13th. The required reviews completed on March 20th.After three weeks, the editor-in-chief, the editor-in-chief said that the review had been completed, and a review was added. At that time, I was very embarrassed. Did the two judges have an objection because the two reviewers were very positive and basically revised?Accepted, no way, can only wait, finally received the acceptance letter of the editor in June 8, 2016, or the review comments of the two judges, finally quiet, the mine teacher Wei is good, next time there is a chanceI will vote for

(2) Thank | zhanxiong

Post the article's status update: Received 20 June 2013Received in revised form 9 September 2013Accepted 23 September 2013Available online xxxx In fact, I first saw everyone's evaluation, I feel that this article will be processed very slowly.Because I didn't worry about graduating, I chose to vote for this magazine.But unexpectedly, it was accepted in 3 months. This speed is really fast, not worse than ACS.I think the processing speed of the magazine article is affected by many aspects.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

The influence of the energy field can be, the engineering second district magazine must be innovative and practical value can be hired, the editor is very responsible, not recommendedEmerging graduate students to contribute.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

I have already submitted 4 papers on the flow and combustion in boilers in this magazine, 2 of which have been published, and 2The articles were all in the first instance, and the review drafts lasted for 14 months and 6 months respectively. In the middle, the editors issued two reminder letters that were not returned. The first trial of the published ones was more than 9 months. I suggest everyone.It is best not to vote for this magazine, the truth of the slow review is not negotiable. The energy sector can consider investing in Energy, Applied Energy, Energy & Fuels, these three magazines are very fast, about 1 monthCan give results, rarely more than 2 months

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This journal should be good, it is worth trying, AugustSubmission, overhaul after two months, cast after 20 days, minor repairs in the past two months, return in 15 days, directly received the next day, many people said that the journal is very slow, compared with the ACS journals, the efficiency is the firstHowever, editors and reviewers are more responsible.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

contributed on October 17, 2011, revised 2 times, notified on September 20, 2012, the impact factor 2.945

(0) Thank | Anonymous

just accepted an article, 4 eachThe revised comments will be given in the month after the revised draft is submitted.The speed is slower and the opinions are fairly pertinent.

(0) Thank | Anonymous

This magazine reviewer is very important. It is recommended that reviewers should be cautious. The reviewer may be the one you recommend.I recommended four or five reviewers at the time, and I was fortunate that one of the four reviewers was the recommended one.The review time was about four and a half months. I gave a major repair, and I made some experiments. I answered them one by one according to the opinions of the reviewers, and made up the relevant experiments. After 15 days, I was sent out, and I received the news one month later.In addition, one of the editors of this journal is Liu Zhenyu, who can choose him when he chooses to edit.

(2) Thank | Anonymous

has invested in an Under review for two months. Most of the papers published recently are about 3 months old and I hope to finish it as soon as possible....

(0) Thank | Anonymous

Manuscript processing speed is very slow, the revised manuscript has been uploaded for more than 1 month and has not been processed.

(0) Thank | Anonymous